Since 2014 the Dutchman, one of the five acquitted, presented 200 denouncements against the sick corruption and many S.O.S.-letters to various Judicial Authorities in Gran Canaria and Madrid. Only 5 denouncements have been treated, but the sentences were clear corrupt. The other 195 simply have been archived.
None of his denouncements and S.O.S.-letters ever has been investigated and his clear evidences have been ignored totally by all the Spanish Judicial Authorities, included the President of Spain Mr. Pedro Sanchez.
Between his arrest on the 22nd of November 2016 and his acquittal on the 14th of July 2022, he also wrote many letters to the Dutch Embassy in Madrid and various departments of Foreign Affairs In the Netherlands, but also they all ignored his S.O.S. signals as if they did not exist. The female representant of the Dutch Embassy played a very dubious role in contacts with the Dutchman.
Has the female representative of the Dutch Embassy, who visited the Dutchman so often in prison, been instructed and manipulated too???
In the first year she visited him every two weeks and after one year every month. When she was with him he told her every detail about the false case 766/2016 and the terror against him before. Everytime she told him that she would pass on everything what he told her to the Dutch Embassy in Madrid.
There are 2 possibilities:
1. She didn’t pass anything to the Dutch Embassy.
If she has been instructed not to do that, it must have been national police 87584 (person 5) and prosecutor (person 6).
It was very noticeable to the Dutchman that everytime when he informed her about the clear crimes of national police, she defended them. She always said that "he just had met the wrong persons in the wrong place" and that "it wasn’t the fault of national police".
This possibilty would smell very much of corruption.
2. The Dutch Embassy has received all her information.
In that case it is clear that The Dutch Embassy has acted unlawfully by failing to comply with their obligation to do everything to prevent a Dutch citizen from being innocently held in a prison abroad, despite the clear information.
This possibility would smell very much of corruption.
After this all he turned to the European Union (EU) in 2021.
The Dutchman informed the EU very detailed about the sick corruption in this false case. However, also the EU ignored it all totally, while it claims to be committed to the fight against corruption.
The EU writes piles of reports on corruption and what should be done about it. And when there is an obvious corruption case, such as this false case 766/2016-073/2019, no organization within the EU says they can do anything about it. They all pass it on to another organization or say that they are not allowed to interfere in internal Spanish affairs.
This means two things:
1. The in this case involved sick corrupt sections of the Spanish judicial system can continue unhindered their sick corrupt practices without any control from any authorization in the EU. They even are compensated for it by the EU.
2. All the piles of reports on corruption are a waste of money.