Sick corruption in Spain, especially in Gran Canaria, such as only is possible in a real police state.

The medieval law of Spain still contains the possibility of four years pre-trial detention. National Police, Public Prosecution Service and Judiciary in Gran Canaria still abuse this law (instituted by Franco to eliminate his opponents) in a sick way, even without having one single evidence.  

Even the (fake) anti-corruption authority in Gran Canaria is sick corrupt.

It is starting to look very much like the Ministry of Justice in Spain will never close the case 766/2016-73/2019 to prevent anyone from outside Spain from interfering with it.

In this case not one single police officer has ever been on the scenes of the supposed crimes to investigate. 

The EU writes thousands of pages about corruption in the EU (wasted money), but does totally nothing against corruption in for example this sick corrupt case.

WHAT IS THE USE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION ??????

In this false case, in addition to the money wasting useless reports, the EU is paying compensations for approximately 8,500 days (!!!) of unjustified detention of foreigners. It seems to be a very lucrative business for Spain.

It is about time to investigate these kind of crimes of the sick corrupt National Police and Justice System in Spain and the possibility of many more innocent foreigners in Spanish prisons, especially in Gran Canaria.
After all these crimes cost the European Society a huge amount of money. 

In 2016 National Police, Public Prosecutor's Office and Court in Gran Canaria, all sick corrupt, set up the false court case 766/2016-073/2019 together with some local Canarian criminals behind the scenes. They forced at least 3 illegal immigrants to make false statements to support their false case.

This false case is set up and supported by next persons: 

person 1.   Criminal local Canarian Mr. J. A. R. (alias Pepe)
person 2.   Criminal local Canarian Mrs. Y. A. D. (alias Yani)
person 3.   Criminal local Canarian Mr. Y. A. S. (alias Yeray)
person 4.   Criminal immigrant from Nigeria Mr. K. O. 
person 5.   Sick corrupt Inspector (Mr.) of National Police with carnet 87584 (Maspalomas)
person 6.   Sick corrupt Prosecutor Mr. M. H. R. (Maspalomas)
person 7.   Sick corrupt Judge Mrs. M. M. V. S. (Maspalomas)
person 8.   Sick corrupt Judge Mr. A. N. H. (Maspalomas)
person 9.   Sick corrupt Mrs. A. M. M. of Banco Popular (Maspalomas-Las Palmas)
person 10. Sick corrupt Prosecutor Mrs. TG (Las Palmas)

Some of their purposes included: 
- obtaining money from the European Union (EU), 
- making promotions
- "stealing" bungalows 
- "stealing" the successful rental of the bungalows by the Dutch travel agency 
  Grancanariatours

Seven foreign innocent suspects were held in pre-trial detention in Gran Canaria prison from November 2016 to October 2020, with only false evidences and fake investigations and without a final trial.

The final trial was only in February 2022. Five of them, among who a Dutchman, where acquitted in July 2022. The other 2 are still being prosecuted, while it is clear that also they are completely innocent

National Police persuaded false protected witnesses to back up their false case with false statements, all dictated by themselve, for rewards in the form of a residence permit, money, work and/or a house from the Spanish government:

- 4 false whitnesses who declared in front of the Judge in the Court:

TP1-Protected whitness 1: Victoria (illegal immigrant from Nigeria, wife of TP3 and good friend of K.O.)-declared to be smuggled and prostituted

TP2-Protected whitness 2: Christine (legal immigrant from Sierra Leone): declared not to be smuggled and prostituted but to have seen and heared things about it

TP3-Protected whitness 3: Charles (illegal immigrant from Nigeria, husband of TP 1, friend of K.O.)

TP4-Protected whitness 4: Stephany (illegal immigrant from Nigeria)-declared to be smuggled and prostituted

For several years before the case TP1, TP2 and TP3 have been good friends and made music together in the same choir in the same church. They all three strongly denied this in Court, while there are pictures as evidences.

- At least 5 false whitnesses who declared only on paper in front of National Police in the policestation.

The result of this complot:

On 22^nd of November 2016 were arrested 5 suspects:

1 Nigerian woman in Bilbao. A few days later she was released by National Police in Bilbao, due to the absence of any evidence. In March 2017 National Police of Gran Canaria arrested her again during her visit in Gran Canaria because of a really redicilous false statement of a false whitness. When she refused to make false statements against other suspects, they put also her in prison.

1 Nigerian man, K. O. (person 4), in Gran Canaria. He only was arrested to insinuate that he would be one of the suspects. When he was released already in March 2017, it was clear that he was not a suspect, but one of the organizers of this false case.

2 Nigerian women in Gran Canaria, among who the ex-wife of K. O.

1 Dutchman in Gran Canaria

In May 2017 were arrested 2 suspects:

2 Nigerian men in Germany. They were extradited to Gran Canaria by the German justice system, which was greatly deceived with false evidences and lies.

These 7 suspects were accused of forming an International Criminal Organization that would have trafficked, exploited, abused, threatened and raped young Nigerian girls in the years 2010-2015.
One day after the arrests in Bilbao and Gran Canaria Policia Nacional publicated in the local newspapers the article “prostitution in bungalows”, with a picture of the Dutchman. It was very noticeable that persons 1 to 3 walked around very enthusiastically in the complex and showed the newspapers with the arrest article to everyone, including the tourists in the bungalows of the Dutchman.

THE STORY: 
It all started with these bungalows, owned by a Dutchman in the bungalow complex Dragon Club II in Playa del Ingles. He had a travel agency in Holland, “Grancanariatours”, with which he recruited tourists for bookings in his bungalows from 2002 till 2017.

Persons 1 to 3: 
The daily exploitation of the bungalows was arranged by the Canarians J. A. R. (president of the complex), Y. A. D. (his daughter) and Y. A. S. (his son in law).
On a daily basis they worked closely together with the Nigerian cleaninggirls, who were suggested to have been forced to have paid sex with the tourists in the bungalows.
In 2014, 2015 and 2016 these 3 Canarians terrorized the Dutchman, included several false complaints against him. It was clear that they wanted to chase him out of the complex to “steal” his bungalows and clients and to take over his business.
Due to serious physical threats, in August 2015 the lawyer of the Dutchman advised him to contract a bodyguard so that he could go to his own bungalows more safely.
In 2015 and 2016 many times he called the national police of Maspalomas to come to the complex to help him when he was terrorized again. They came, but never did anything to help him. He also has presented 19 denouncements in the police station of Maspalomas against this terror, often with videos and sound recordings as 100% evidence.
Would the Dutchman have asked the national police so often to enter the complex if he was prostituting Nigerian girls there daily???

However, the three Canarians were so strongly protected and supported by national police and justice of Maspalomas, that his denouncements didn’t have any result at all. 

Because of this all he contracted an estate agency in 2014, who wrote to him in 2017 that he never could sell even one bungalow, because person 1 always chased the potential buyers out of the complex brutally.

When the three Canarians realized that the Dutchman didn’t yield for their terror, they called in the help of the above-mentioned persons 4 to 9.

Person 4: K. O. (person 4) was accused in 2016 by his ex-wife, one of the 7 arrested suspects, who had very strong evidences that he would have arranged the acid crime against her in 2013, because of what she is mutilated all over her body now. She had an employment agency, with which she supplied Nigerian cleaning girls for the cleaning of the bungalows of the Dutchman. National police persuaded him to make false statements in case 766/2016 in exchange for the annulment of his ex-wife's denouncement against him, which he eagerly took advantage of.

Persons 5 and 6:  You can read more about their sick corrupt crimes in chapter “NATIONAL POLICE AND PROSECUTORS GRAN CANARIA”

Persons 7 and 8: They supported persons 5 and 6 in all there sick corrupt crimes and worked very close together with them in this false case.  

Person 9:  The Dutchman had a mortgage on 3 of his 4 bungalows with Banco Popular.
He had a female contactperson in Banco Popular with who he could communicate very well in English. Suddenly in may 2016 this contactperson was replaced by Mrs. A. M. M. (person 9). She didn’t speak any word English. The Dutchman hardly could communicate with her. Very soon she adviced him to renew his mortgage in haste. Because of his trust in his bank, where he came already from 2002, he signed the new mortgage in August, accidently just 3 months before he would be arrested.
Only when he was in prison, he find out that the new mortgage was very bad for him. The bungalow which was without any mortgage before suddenly was included in the new mortgage. That meant, that if he could no longer meet his financial obligations with the bank, the bank would be entitled to confiscate all his bungalows.
This all was very well prepared with the purpose to exhaust his financial resources so much that he could no longer afford a lawyer when he would be in prison. The Dutchman wrote a lot of letters from out of prison to person 9, but he never got any answer. She communicated with everybody, except with the owner of the concerning bungalows himself.
Because (as planned) the Dutchman couldn't meet his financial obligations to the bank, the judge (person 7) was preparing to confiscate his 4 bungalows. However, inspite of that J.A.R. (person 1) did everything to chase the potential buyers out of the complex, the Dutchman succeeded in selling his bungalows by himself and paid off his mortgages.

Person 10:  Sick corrupt Prosecutor Mrs. TG (Las Palmas). She replaced prosecutor person 6 in 2021. You can read more about her sick corrupt crimes in chapter “NATIONAL POLICE AND PROSECUTORS GRAN CANARIA”. She is, if possible, even more corrupt than her predecessor.

At least 8 extremeley corrupt lawyers have followed up the instructions from the National Police to support the false case: 
- not to do anything to defend their suspects,
- to extract as much money as possible from them
- to support the false case in everything
- to set the suspects up against each other
- to set up the families of the suspects against the suspects

- Lawyer J.C.M.  - Maspalomas
- Lawyer F.T.F. - Maspalomas
- Lawyer K.B. - Madrid
- Lawyer P.S.V - Vecindario
- Lawyer M.S.E.A. - Las Palmas
- Lawyer M.C.V. - Las Palmas
- Lawyer F.J.L.T. - las Palmas
- Lawyer A.F. - Las Palmas

In 2020 the Dutchman denounced only policefriend lawyer P.S.V. for his sick corrupt behaviour with the association of lawyers, but also this denouncement was simply archived without any investigation. In 2021 he appealed against this sentence, but he still is waiting for a sentence. Very probably he will never hear something anymore of that appeal. After more than 200 futile denouncements he doesn't denounce the other sick corrupt lawyers anymore.
Also the lawyers can be as corrupt as they want, because there is not any organization at all in the EU who calls them for accountability.

Just a few of the many clear contradictions of the protected whitnesses, totally ignored by even the lawyers of the suspects, are: 

By TP1=protected whitness 1: 

1. On 9^th of March 2016 she stated in the policestation that she was prostituted “in the house of one of the suspects and in the cars of her clients”

On 31^st of March 2017 she stated in the exploratory court hearing that she was prostituted “in the house of one of the suspects and in Hotel Vecindario” 
In the video of the exploratory court hearing on 31^st of March 2017 she stated that she was prostituted “in her own house and in the streets”. This means that this video has been manipulated.
On 31st of March 2017 she also declared that it was not possible to sleep with clients in the bungalows of the Dutchman, because then everybody in the complex could see what she was doing with the clients.

On 1^st of February 2022 she stated in the final court that she was prostituted “in the   streets and in the bungalows of the Dutchman” 

2. On 9^th of March 2016 she stated in the policestation that “she waited for her clients at the entrance of the bungalows and that they went together to the house of one of the suspects to have paid sex”.

On 31^st of March 2017 she stated in the exploratory court that “the Dutchman brought her clients from the bungalows to the house of one of the suspects to have paid sex with her”
In the video of the exploratory court hearing on 31^st of March 2017 this statement has disappeared. This means that this video has been manipulated.

3. On 31^st of March 2017 she stated in the exploratory court hearing that she did not know J.A.R. (person 1), Y.A.D. (person 2) and Y.A.S. (person 3), while she had worked together with them in the bungalows of the Dutchman daily for 5 years. It is very clear that everything is done to leave these three criminals out of the case.

4. On 31^st of March 2017 she stated in the exploratory court hearing that “when she was still in Nigeria, one of the suspects told her by phone that the debt would be 50,000 euros and that she and this suspect reached an agreement.”

On 1^st of February 2022 she stated in the final court that “2 days after she arrived in Gran Canaria, one of the suspects told her that the debt would be 50,000 euros”

5. On 9^th of March 2016 in the policestation and on 31^st of March 2017 in the exploratory    court hearing she stated that she never had seen even 1 euro of all the money that she earned with the cleaning and prostitution and that she was deadly afraid of the suspects.

On 1^st of February 2022 in the final court she stated that after every month she went to the house of one of the suspects with all the earned money from cleaning and prostitution in her hand to determine together with the suspect the amount that could be deducted from her supposed debt. Every month she would have written that amount on a sheet of paper, what, according a reliable report, seems to be written in 1 day. 

6. K.O. (person 4) always stated that he didn't know if Victoria (TP1) has been prostituted, while he lived in the house where, according the statements of TP1 on 9^th of March 2016 in the policestation and on 31^st of March 2017 in the exploratory court hearing, she has been prostituted.

By TP2=protected whitness 2:
1  On 3rd of August 2016 she declared that "she has seen that the tourists in the bungalows paid cash money to one of the subjects for having sex with a cleaning girl".

On 30^st of March 2017 she stated in the exploratory court hearing that "she never has seen that a tourist paid money to one of the subjects for having sex with a cleaning girl".

2  On 3rd of August 2016 she declared that "she began to have a more close relation with one of the suspects in july 2015".

On 30^st of March 2017 she stated in the exploratory court hearing that "she began to have a more close relation with one of the suspects already in 2011". This time was advanced to allow her to make false statements, dictated by persons 5 and 6, over the period 2010-2015.

TP2 escaped to Africa just before the final court of 2022, because she knew that once she will be hold reponsable for all her false statements, dictated by persons 5 and 6.

By TP3=protected whitness 3:

1  On 5th of August 2016 he declared that TP1 came to Europe via Italy, while TP1 herself declared on 9th of March 2016 that she came to Europe via Greece.

2  On 30^st of March 2017 in the exploratory court hearing TP3 declared that he went alone to national police to present a denouncement that TP1 would have been prostituted, while TP1 herself declared that they went together.

3  On 1st of February 2022 during the final court TP3 declared that he had pictures of TP1 in his camera, which show that TP1 has injuries in her neck because of a fight with one of the suspects, while TP1 declared that he had this pictures in his computer.

4  On 1st of February 2022 he declared that he wanted to show nacional police the messages of the Dutchman in the mobile phone of TP1 with threatenings that he should send assassins from Latin America to hurt her, but that he couldn't get them out of the phone, because the phone was too full.

By TP4=protected whitness 4:

1  On 30^st of March 2017 in the exploratory court hearing she declared that "she never has paid 1 euro to one of the suspects"

On 8th of February 2022 in the final court she declared that "she has paid 20,000 euros to one of the suspects".

2  On 30^st of March 2017 in the exploratory court hearing she declared that "she never has been threatened"

On 8th of February 2022 in the final court she declared that "she many times has been threatened"

3  On 30^st of March 2017 in the exploratory court hearing she declared that "she never has been prostituted"

On 8th of February 2022 in the final court she declared that "she has been prostituted"

Very noticeable is that just before the final court persons 5 and 6 took away the children from TP4 and returned them just after the final court. This really is forcing somebody to make false statements.
 

THE SITUATION NOW IS:
On 14th of July 2022 the replacement judges (so not persons 7 and 8) acquitted 5 suspects, among who the Dutchman. Long prison sentences continued to be imposed on the other 2 suspects, while it was very clear that also they were innocent. In this way National Police and Public Prosecutor's Office of Gran Canaria intend to keep the case alive, so that still they can keep holding their heads up by pretending to have dismantled an international criminal organization and to avoid that the European Union can interfere with the case.

However, they didn't expect that in February 2023 the 2 suspects were able to appeal very strongly through a very professional and not corrupt lawyer from Bilbao to the Ministry of Justice in Madrid, which also has received the damage claims of the 5 acquitted suspects in July 2023. If Madrid rejects the appeal, it will go directly to the court in Strasbourg, where the judges will burst out laughing when they study the case.
The Ministry of Justice in Madrid now pretends to investigate the case and has asked the Court in Gran Canaria to bring all the information about the case. On that the Dutchman has send a lot of information, of which he is sure that Madrid will not receive it from the Court in Gran Canaria, to Madrid.
This all means that the damage claims of the 5 acquitted suspects, which according the law has to be treated within maximum 6 months (so before February 2024), are delayed now, such as also the appeal of the 2 remaining suspects, which is presented already in February 2023.
It's starting to look like that also the Ministry of Justice in Spain never wants to end this case to avoid that the European Union has the right to interfere with it. The corruption and madness in this case go on and on and never seem to end.
It is a big shame that this all is possible in the European Union.

Because of this false case the Dutchman has completeley lost his well going business "Grancanariatours" in Gran Canaria and with that his entire pension.

On the other hand, the main organizers of this false case have achieved what they wanted:

- Persons 1 to 3 now run the former business of the Dutchman "Grancanariatours" in Gran Canaria, with a false licence of the Tourism Board Authority and without paying taxes to the Tax Authority, which is possible because they are protected very strongly also by these authorities. Yes, it is one big swamp of corruption in Gran Canaria.

- Persons 5, 6 and 10 will get or already have got their promotions.

- Persons 7 and 8 held the suspects hostage in prison for as long as possible (totally about 8500 days !!!), with what they achieved a huge compensation from the European Union for the Ministry of Justice in Gran Canaria.

- All the at least 9 protected whitnesses have received their rewards for their false statements already in 2016.

CHAPEAU SPAIN

Since 2014 the Dutchman, one of the five acquitted, presented 200 denouncements against the sick corruption and many S.O.S.-letters to various Judicial Authorities in Gran Canaria and Madrid. Only 5 denouncements have been treated, but the sentences were clear corrupt. The other 195 simply have been archived.

None of his denouncements and S.O.S.-letters ever has been investigated and his clear evidences have been ignored totally by all the Spanish Judicial Authorities, included the President of Spain Mr. Pedro Sanchez.

Between his arrest on the 22nd of November 2016 and his acquittal on the 14th of July 2022, he also wrote many letters to the Dutch Embassy in Madrid and various departments of Foreign Affairs In the Netherlands, but also they all ignored his S.O.S. signals as if they did not exist. The female representant of the Dutch Embassy played a very dubious role in contacts with the Dutchman.

Has the female representative of the Dutch Embassy, who visited the Dutchman so often in prison, been instructed and manipulated too???

In the first year she visited him every two weeks and after one year every month. When she was with him he told her every detail about the false case 766/2016 and the terror against him before. Everytime she told him that she would pass on everything what he told her to the Dutch Embassy in Madrid.

There are 2 possibilities:

1. She didn’t pass anything to the Dutch Embassy.
If she has been instructed not to do that, it must have been national police 87584 (person 5) and prosecutor (person 6).
It was very noticeable to the Dutchman that everytime when he informed her about the clear crimes of national police, she defended them. She always said that "he just had met the wrong persons in the wrong place" and that "it wasn’t the fault of national police".
This possibilty would smell very much of corruption.

2. The Dutch Embassy has received all her information.
In that case it is clear that The Dutch Embassy has acted unlawfully by failing to comply with their obligation to do everything to prevent a Dutch citizen from being innocently held in a prison abroad, despite the clear information.
This possibility would smell very much of corruption.  

After this all he turned to the European Union (EU) in 2021.

The Dutchman informed the EU very detailed about the sick corruption in this false case. However, also the EU ignored it all totally, while it claims to be committed to the fight against corruption.
The EU writes piles of reports on corruption and what should be done about it. And when there is an obvious corruption case, such as this false case 766/2016-073/2019, no organization within the EU says they can do anything about it. They all pass it on to another organization or say that they are not allowed to interfere in internal Spanish affairs.

This means two things:
1. The in this case involved sick corrupt sections of the Spanish judicial system can continue unhindered their sick corrupt practices without any control from any authorization in the EU. They even are compensated for it by the EU.
2. All the piles of reports on corruption are a waste of money.